On February 10, a significant development unfolded within Sudan’s largest antiwar coalition, Taqaddum, marking a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict that has engulfed the nation for nearly two years. The coalition, which was established in October 2023 under the leadership of Abdalla Hamdok, the former prime minister who faced ousting by the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), saw a division among its ranks pertaining to the formation of a parallel government backed by the RSF.
This split resulted in the emergence of a new faction, now referred to as Taasis (Foundation), comprising primarily armed movements that have opted to engage politically within the RSF’s newly formed administration. This strategic shift reflects their focus on professing a greater influence in governance through their military capabilities. Analysts suggest that these armed groups seek to convert their combat prowess into political capital, thereby positioning themselves integral to the ongoing governance structures.
Conversely, traditional political leaders, including Hamdok and his allies, chose to abstain from collaboration with the RSF, opting instead to form a new coalition called Somoud (Resilience). This coalition aims to maintain a neutral stance in the controversial climate, focusing on restoring peace and moving towards a democratic transition, which has been elusive since the military coup of 2021.
Critics have pointed to the challenges faced by Taqaddum, particularly after the coalition signed a Declaration of Principles with the RSF in January 2024, shortly after the RSF’s violent takeover of critical regions. This agreement has drawn scrutiny and has prompted a wave of skepticism regarding the coalition’s integrity, with many observers alleging that it may obfuscate the alleged human rights violations committed by the RSF.
Despite these setbacks, some analysts view the factionalization of Taqaddum as an opportunity for resurgence. They argue that Somoud, as a smaller yet refined coalition, can potentially reconnect with the Sudanese populace by prioritizing local concerns and distancing itself from controversial affiliations. Experts emphasize the importance of outreach to local organizations and grassroots movements, reinforcing that the coalition’s messaging needs to resonate with the lived experiences of everyday Sudanese citizens.
In the face of adversity, Somoud representatives assert their commitment to transparency and community engagement, arguing that prior criticisms of Taqaddum’s closeness to the RSF were unfounded and stemmed from mischaracterizations fueled by military interests.
As the situation continues to evolve, many Sudanese civilians express a preference for a stable governance structure that promotes peace. The complex dynamics at play highlight the necessity for ongoing dialogue and a robust commitment to resolving the multifaceted crises that have led to widespread humanitarian challenges across the nation.
#PoliticsNews #MiddleEastNews